Workshops
Session A
Session B
Session C
There is a registration fee for each workshop. This fee includes admission
to the workshops selected, materials and workshop notes. Workshops with higher
fees additional
Session A: Noon-3:00 PM
Top of Page | Links
$40.00
Alan Clements, University of Teesside, England
alanclements@compuserve.com
Some students see computer architecture as an irrelevance because they will
never design computers. This workshop describes how computer architecture can
be made interesting bydemonstrating that its core concepts are applicable to
all areas of computer science. The workshop will give participants an opportunity
to think about what we teach and why we teach it. One exercise will be to create
a modern curriculum. At Teesside we have concentrated on themes designed to
interest students
while covering major concepts. For example, cache memory improves a computer's
performance for little additional cost, allowing us to introduce performance
metrics and design trade-offs. We look at the assembly language generated by
a C compiler to reinforce ideas about pointers and passing parameters mechanism.
We discuss high-performance computer buses and the facilities they offer-in
particular the arbitration bus. Arbitration allows you to discuss how the hardware
allocates resources and cover important topics such as fairness versus prioritization.
Top of Page | Links
$40.00
P.K. Imbrie (Purdue University, imbrie@purdue.edu)
César Malavé (Texas A&M University,
malave@tamu.edu)
Jim Morgan (Texas A&M University, j-morgan@tamu.edu)
Dan Budny (University of Pittsburgh, budny@pitt.edu)
This session introduces a faculty member to the basic concepts of active/collaborative
learning (ACL), as well as how to apply these concepts in their courses. The
session is presented in an active format with attendees working in teams and
learning about ACL by using ACL methods. Attendees will be asked to work on
a sample lesson plan, based upon their current teaching paradigm, and then modify
the lesson plan during the remainder of the workshop using the key elements
of teaming and active/collaborative learning.
This session also addresses issues related to team formation, such as what
constitutes teamwork, team evaluation, and the like, and is taught in an active
manner. In addition, the workshop introduces the necessary elements for successful
teaming in the college classroom environment and addresses typical concerns
of faculty members, such as how to grade teams, evaluate team performance, facilitate
teams, etc.. Attendees will work in teams to answer some of the most commonly
asked questions about managing teams and then present their solutions.
Top of Page | Links
$140.00 (includes materials)
P.K. Raju, Thomas Walter Professor
Department of Mechanical Engineering
Auburn University
pkraju@eng.auburn.edu Chetan Sankar, Thomas Walter Professor
Department of Management
Auburn University
sankar@business.auburn.edu
If you are an educator looking for new methods to invigorate your classes and
show the relevance of theory to design and practice, this workshop is for you.
The instructional materials used in this workshop received the 1999 ASME Curriculum
Innovation Award and 1998 Premier Award for Excellence in Engineering Education
Courseware sponsored by John Wiley & Sons, and NEEDS. The material consists
of four case studies, competency materials, multi-media supplemental material.
The use of case studies developed in partnership with industries and partially
funded by the National Science Foundation DUE #9752353 and 9950514 brings real-world
problem solving scenarios into the classroom. It provides opportunities for
students to work in teams, learn from peers, and learn from themselves. An external
evaluation suggests that implementation of this methodology in engineering design
courses fulfills many of the ABET 2000 criteria and might lead to improvement
of grades of students in subsequent courses.
Top of Page | Links
$40.00
Barbara M. Olds
Professor, Liberal Arts and International Studies
Colorado School of Mines
bolds@mines.edu
Mary Besterfield-Sacre
Assistant Professor
University of Pittsburgh
mbsacre@engrng.pitt.edu
Larry J. Shuman
Professor and Dean of Academic Affairs
University of Pittsburgh
shuman@engrng.pitt.edu
Harvey Wolfe
Professor and Department Chair
University of Pittsburgh
hwolfe@engrng.pitt.edu
Jack McGourty
Associate Dean, Fu Foundation School of Engineering and Applied Science
Columbia University
jm723@columbia.edu
Ron Miller
Professor, Chemical Engineering and Petroleum Refining
Colorado School of Mines
rmiller@mines.edu
Cynthia J. Atman
Director, Center for Engineering Learning and Teaching
and Associate Professor, Industrial Engineering
University of Washington
atman@engr.washington.edu
Gloria Rogers
Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology
gloria.rogers@rose-hulman.edu
ABET's Engineering Criteria 2000 document states that "the
assessment process must demonstrate that the outcomes important to the mission
of the institution and the objectives of the program, including those listed
above [a-k], are being measured." This workshop is designed to help institutions
and programs select the best assessment methods given their contexts (including
program objectives, institution and program size, resources etc.). We have three
main goals for this interactive workshop:
- To familiarize attendees with the major assessment methods that can be used
to measure student achievement of EC 2000 learning outcomes a-k.
- To discuss the pros and cons of each assessment method.
- To provide participants with materials on the various methods that they
can use to develop their own assessment plans. Materials include a select
bibliography and the URL for our NSF-sponsored assessment project.
This workshop will build on a successful workshop presented by the same presenters
at FIE99.
Top of Page | Links
$40.00
Dr. Judith Lyczko
Director of the Center for Professional Development
Cooper Union
leap@cooper.edu
Dr. George Sidebotham
Professor of Chemical Engineering
Cooper Union
sidebo@cooper.edu
and a Cooper Union engineering undergraduate (to be selected)
Cooper Union and the New York City Outward Bound Center have collaborated for
five years on developing leadership training for undergraduate engineers using
experiential learning approaches. Structuring a student's experiences so
they become active participants in acquiring knowledge, developing skills, and
solving problems is a key part of both Cooper Union's team approach in
the engineering laboratory and Outward Bound's expeditionary learning principles.
This collaboration has developed a flexible package of engineering-related leadership
training initiatives and physical exercises focused on increasing the professional
confidence and personal self-esteem of women and men interested in science and
engineering. With an underlying focus on professional development issues, Outward
Bound s expertise in physically challenging outdoor expeditions (rock-climbing,
low and high ropes, canoeing, hiking, orienteering) is customized to the engineering
classroom/lab and to the corporate/workplace needs of engineering undergraduates
("hands-on" problem-solving, innovation, gender, teamwork, communications,
diversity, conflict negotiation, risk-taking). Up to 15 workshop attendees are
invited to participate in physical challenges, team-building exercises, and
problem-solving initiatives; each will receive materials for replication of
the initiatives and exercises at their schools.
Top of Page | Links
$40.00
Flora McMartin
Audience: reform minded faculty who are novice users of computer enhanced teaching
and learning materials and who are willing to adapt innovative methods developed
by others to fit their own goals.
Workshop outcomes:
- faculty will have increased self confidence and ability to find, evaluate,
select, and use computer enhanced learning resources in teaching
- faculty will be able to quickly find, evaluate, select, and use these resources
- faculty will be able to integrate computer based resources into course
and curriculum design using effective pedagogical practices
- faculty will practice applying evaluation criteria to various computer
enhanced learning tools and technologies
Session B: 3:15-6:15 PM
Top of Page | Links
$40.00
Professor Cindy Atmann @ Univ. of Washington <atman@engr.washington.edu>
Professor Larry Carlson @Univ. of Colorado <Lawrence.Carlson@Colorado.EDU>
Professor Ed Crawley @ MIT (unconfirmed) <crawley@mait.edu>
Professor Pam Eibeck @ NAU <Pamela.Eibeck@nau.edu>
Professor Dan Frey @ Olin <danfrey@mit.edu>
Professor Anthony Marchese @ Rowan <marchese@rowan.edu>
Professor Donald E Richards@ Rose-Hulman <donald.e.richards@rose-hulman.edu>
Professor Sheri Sheppard@ Stanford & Carnegie Foundation
for the Advancement of Teaching <sheppard@cdr.stanford.edu>
Dr. Jackie Sullivan Univ. of Colorado <sully@neptune.colorado.edu>
Professor Ian Waitz@ MIT (unconfirmed) <iaw@mit.edu>
Dr. Eric Van Duzer@ Univ. of California-Berkeley <evd@uclink4.berkeley.edu>
The overarching objective of this workshop is to identify the major factors
that contribute to the success of innovations in engineering education. In addition,
small-group discussions will offer participants a chance to present and provide
feedback on innovations that they are undertaking in their educational settings.
To this end, the session will:
1) highlight successful innovations by "telling their stories". The stories
will be on:
- Creating and implementing design courses from freshman-to-senior years involving
multiple engineering departments.
- Creating an integrated sophomore engineering curriculum organized around
a central theme --- conservation & accounting principles combined with
system modeling.
- Establishing an "infrastruture" for improving teaching and learning to support
an entire school of engineering.
- Restructuring an entire department.
- Creating a new school of engineering from the ground up.
- Rethinking how we think about our programs.
2) Provide participants with an opportunity to talk about their projects/experiments/innovations
in a small group setting
Top of Page | Links
$40.00
Barbara Bogue
Director Women Engineering Program
Penn State University
Bbogue@engr.psu.edu
Rose Marra, Ph.D., Director Engineering Instructional Services
Penn State University
rmarra@psu.edu
This training session will expose engineering faculty and administrators
to "In Their Own Words," a video-based workshop targeted toward engineering
faculty and designed to enhance the overall learning environment. The
target audience for the FIE workshop is engineering faculty members and
administrators, directors of minority and women in engineering programs,
faculty development personnel and other personnel who you believe would
make a good facilitation team for this workshop at your institution. The
objective is to develop with these attendees the skills necessary to facilitate
this workshop (the "In Their Own Words" Video and accompanying workshop
materials) at their institutions. Participants will come away with the
workshop materials and the training necessary to offer the workshop at
their own institutions.
Top of Page
| Links
$40.00
Jeffrey E. Froyd
Texas A&M University
froyd@ee.tamu.edu
P. K. Imbrie
Purdue University
imbrie@purdue.edu
Curriculum integration is a pedagogical theory that asserts that learning can
be facilitated by structuring multiple, cross-disciplinary learning activities
so as to help students build connections among the topics that are presented.
Students are learning a number of topics simultaneously and they actively expand
their cognitive networks by adding new knowledge to their existing networks.
Therefore, students may more easily and effectively assimilate new information
if faculty coordinate and relate topics across different subjects and to topics
external to their course. At the end of the workshop, participants will 1) be
able to list organizing principles for integrating topics; 2) will be able to
describe examples of integrated curricula; 3) will approach problems in science
and engineering differently using an integrated approach; and 4) have printed
and electronic resources to assist their ability to integrate topics. Participants
should come ready to work on their own underlying ideas for integration and
to develop exercises that they can use when they complete the workshop.
Top of Page | Links
$40.00
John A. N. Lee
Department of Computer Science
Virginia Tech
janlee@cc.vt.edu
Kevin Bowyer
Computer Science and Engineering
University of South Florida
kwb@csee.usf.edu
Future faculty in computer science and engineering will be expected to incorporate
considerations of ethical, social, and professional concerns into their technical
courses while at the same time utilizing innovative techniques of managing teaching
and learning. Neither of these topics is typically part of the training of future
faculty, and yet will be important elements of their course content. This workshop
will provide insights into the available resources for melding professionalism
and active learning into the lesson plans for the courses that the participants
expect to teach when they begin to offer their first courses. The outcome is
expected to include class outlines linked to available resources for professionalism
topics to be presented through active learning techniques.
Top of Page | Links
$40.00
Dr. Sudhir Mehta
Professor, Mechanical Engineering and Applied Mechanics
North Dakota State University
mehta@badlands.nodak.edu
Dr. Scott Danielson
Associate Professor, Manufacturing and Aeronautical
Engineering Technology
Arizona State University East
sdanielson@asu.edu
This interactive workshop has two main components. First, proven
pedagogical findings for enhancing student learning will be discussed in both
small and large group formats. After small group discussion and reporting, the
workshop leaders will share their twelve "Next Generation (NG) Principals"
for enhancing student learning based on the literature and their own work (supported
in part by the recent National Science Foundation grant "Statics: The next
generation"). The second workshop component will focus on developing an
implementation plan for using these proven methods in your own classes.
Again, the workshop leaders will share how the NG Principals were implemented
in their classes (with enrollments of 22, 50, and 100) at two different institutions,
along with student assessment data. Additional information about this workshop
will be available at http://www.ndus.nodak.edu/instruct/mehta/FIE .
Top of Page | Links
$40.00
Michel Marcus
Penn State York
mxm81@psu.edu
Students from Engineering Technology Programs should be able to work as members
of Project Teams with Engineers to help find solutions to technical problems.
Come and learn the methodology for problem solving by participating on a project
team to derive solutions to an actual electromechanical design problem using
a hematology analyzer from industry. This exercise will utilize the methods
actually used by a project team from a Biomedical Instrumentation Corporation
in which both engineers and technicians from various disciplines participated.
Session C: 7:00-10:00 PM
Top of Page | Links
Top of Page | Links
$65.00
James M. Conrad
North Carolina State University, and
Project Manager, Ericsson, Inc.
Research Triangle Park, NC 27709
jconrad@stiquito.com
This is a hands-on workshop! Stiquito is an inexpensive, hexapod robot that
is used for secondary school and college education. Stiquito is a wonderful
learning vehicle because the robot materials are included in a textbook! Workshop
attendees will be given their own robot and building instructions in the book
Stiquito for Beginners: An Introduction to Robotics. Attendees will build
the robot and learn how to use the robot to teach students topics like engineering,
electronics, PC programming, and robotics. Workshop fees include the book and
robot, but attendees should bring a pair of needle nose pliers, a Xacto knife,
and a 9-volt battery for robot assembly. For more information about Stiquito
and this workshop, visit http://www.stiquito.com.
Top of Page
| Links
16) Asynchronous Learning Network
for Large Courses
$40.00
Michael Thoennessen
Michigan State University
thoennessen@nscl.msu.edu
Ed Kashy
Michigan State University
kashy@nscl.msu.edu
Guy Albertelli
Michigan State University
albertel@pilot.msu.edu
Asynchronous learning networks (ALNs) have typically been used to serve students
in online courses with relatively small enrollments. Over the last few years,
several networked tools have been developed to implement ALNs for large on-campus
lecture classes (>250 students). The tutorial will focus on the system CAPA
(Computer-Assisted Personalized Approach) developed at Michigan State University
and implemented at over 50 institutions. CAPA can be used to create, deliver,
and grade assignments, quizzes and examinations. It provides a discussion forum
for students collaboration via the Web, and features extensive statistical information
on student performance, both individually and for the class. Emphasis is placed
on conceptual exercises to stimulate discussion among students during and outside
lecture sessions. Examples of the wide variety of problems, questions, and simulations
that can be applied in different fields will be presented. In addition to an
introduction of the features and main components of CAPA, the workshop will
present and discuss successes and problems encountered in the broad implementation
of this technology in large enrollment courses.
Top of Page | Links
$40.00
Nikos J. Mourtos
Faculty Instructional Development Coordinator
San Jose State University
abebe@voyager.engr.sjsu.edu
njmourtos@coastside.net
Cooperative learning (CL), though not a new concept, appeared
in engineering classrooms rather late (late 1980's) but has been gaining
ground ever since. The reason it is becoming so popular, is none other than
its effectiveness in helping students learn. In this workshop, participants
will:
- Experience firsthand active learning, cooperative learning, and problem-based
learning.
- Learn how to use CL effectively by structuring positive interdependence
and individual accountability into all group activities.
- Discuss the impact of CL on student performance and attitude as well
as the effectiveness of the teaching / learning process with and without CL.
- Discuss the challenges in implementing CL and brainstorm ways to overcome
these hallenges.
- Make a lesson plan to use CL in one of their classes.
- Learn how to quickly assess the effectiveness of their teams.
- Learn how to assess the effectiveness of CL in their classes.
18) Learning Styles in Science
and Engineering: Separating Fact from Fiction
$40.00
Teresa Larkin-Hein
American University
thein@american.edu
Dan D. Budny
University of Pittsburgh
budny@pitt.edu
A growing body of research suggests that increased learning
gains can be achieved with adult students when instruction is designed with
learning styles in mind. In this workshop, a brief summary of current research
on learning styles, particularly as it pertains to science and engineering education
will be provided. In addition, a summary of several prominent learning style
models and their associated assessment tools will be shared. These learning
style models include (but are not limited to): The Dunn and Dunn Model, the
Kolb Model, and the Felder-Silverman Model. These models will be compared and
contrasted in terms of their usefulness and application both inside and outside
of the classroom. A brief summary of successful teaching and learning style
strategies designed to assist faculty in the implementation of a learning style
approach in their own classrooms will also be shared. Emphasis will be placed
on adaptation of these strategies for use with a diverse population of students.
Throughout this workshop, we will attempt to separate "fact from fiction"
in relation to how to adapt and use a learning style approach in the classroom.
Top of Page | Links
$75.00 (includes book)
Larry G. Richards
Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering
University of Virginia
lgr@virginia.edu
David W. Lewis
Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering
University of Virginia
dwl@virginia.edu
Henry Bolanos
U.S. Surgical Corporation
Yale University
University of Auckland
HENRY@compuserve.com
In this workshop, we describe our experiences teaching
a course on Creativity and New Product Development at three universities
(the University of Virginia, Yale University and the University of Auckland).
Student teams develop an idea for a consumer product, analyze it, construct
a prototype, develop a manufacturing plan, conduct a financial analysis,
and write a business plan. Their final class presentation is designed
as an appeal for venture capital, accompanied by a prospectus. Examples
of several successful projects will be described in detail, and we will
review what we have learned from our students over the life of this class.
The participants will experience the major milestones
for these projects through hands-on activities at the workshop. They will
complete selected class exercises and assignments - both individually
and in teams.
Top of Page
| Links
Special session from NSF
Wednesday, October 18, 2000 from 7:00-10:00pm in Chouteau A.
No fee or prior registration required.
Andrew Bernat, Peggie Weeks, Greg Tait, Harriet Taylor
Program Directors National Science Foundation
This workshop will highlight NSF Division of Undergraduate Education programs of interest to college faculty, discussing the opportunities, requirements and guidelines. It will include a discussion of the characteristics of a competitive proposal and the proposal process. Attendees will participate in a mock review panel using actual funded proposals in order to get a deeper understanding of the process. The goal is to help attendees develop competetive proposals in both computer science and in engineering.
Top of Page
| Links
|